Linux ·
openSUSE Leap · Security advisory · December 12, 2025
openSUSE Leap · Security advisory · December 12, 2025OPENSUSE-SU-2025:20150-1: Security update for 27 packages
OPENSUSE-SU-2025:20150-1, released December 12, 2025, fixes 27 CVEs across 27 products. None of them is reported as exploited. Patch Radar priority: High.
High
CVEs closed
27
None rated Critical
Exploited
0
None reported
Highest CVSS
7.8
Base score, 0 to 10
Highest EPSS
0.0136
71st percentile
Priority of the 27 CVEs
Patch now 0
Urgent 0
High 7
Routine 20
Fixed package versions
| Product | Release | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| bpftool | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 7.5.0-160000.2.3 |
| cross-aarch64-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-arm-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-avr-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-bpf-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-epiphany-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-hppa-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-hppa64-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-i386-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-ia64-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-loongarch64-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-m68k-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-mips-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-ppc-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-ppc64-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-ppc64le-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-pru-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-riscv64-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-rx-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-s390-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-s390x-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-sparc-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-sparc64-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-spu-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-x86_64-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
| cross-xtensa-binutils | opensuse-leap 16.0 | 2.45-160000.1.1 |
CVEs this fix closes
| Priority | CVE | Title | CVSS | EPSS | Exploitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | CVE-2025-0840 | binutils: A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in GNUBinutils up to 2.43 | 7.5 | 0.0076 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2025-1179 | binutils: A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43 | 7.5 | 0.0057 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2025-7545 | GNU Binutils objcopy.c copy_section heap-based overflow | 7.8 | 0.0030 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2025-5245 | GNU Binutils objdump debug.c debug_type_samep memory corruption | 7.8 | 0.0030 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2025-5244 | GNU Binutils ld elflink.c elf_gc_sweep memory corruption | 7.8 | 0.0030 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2025-11083 | binutils: A vulnerability has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45 | 7.8 | 0.0026 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2025-7546 | GNU Binutils elf.c bfd_elf_set_group_contents out-of-bounds write | 7.8 | 0.0021 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-1153 | binutils: A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in GNU Binutils2.43/2.44 | 5.9 | 0.0136 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-1178 | binutils: A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43 | n/a | 0.0080 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-1181 | binutils: A vulnerability classified as critical was found in GNU Binutils 2.43 | n/a | 0.0071 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-1180 | GNU Binutils ld elf-eh-frame.c _bfd_elf_write_section_eh_frame memory corruption | 3.1 | 0.0070 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-1176 | binutils: A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43 and classified as critical.This issue affects the function _bfd_elf_gc... | 5.0 | 0.0067 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-1147 | binutils: A vulnerability has been found in GNU Binutils 2.43 and classified asproblematic | 5.3 | 0.0067 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-1148 | binutils: A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43 and classified asproblematic | 3.1 | 0.0064 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-1152 | binutils: This update for binutils fixes the following issues: - Do not enable '-z gcs=implicit' on aarch64 for old codestream... | 3.7 | 0.0061 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-1150 | GNU Binutils ld libbfd.c bfd_malloc memory leak | 3.1 | 0.0061 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-1151 | binutils: This update for binutils fixes the following issues: - Do not enable '-z gcs=implicit' on aarch64 for old codestream... | n/a | 0.0061 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-1182 | binutils: A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in GNUBinutils 2.43 | n/a | 0.0059 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-1149 | binutils: This update for binutils fixes the following issues: - Do not enable '-z gcs=implicit' on aarch64 for old codestream... | 3.1 | 0.0058 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-3198 | binutils-ia64-linux-gnu: A vulnerability has been found in GNU Binutils 2.43/2.44 and classified as problematic | 5.5 | 0.0029 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-8224 | GNU Binutils BFD Library elf.c bfd_elf_get_str_section null pointer dereference | 5.5 | 0.0028 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-8225 | GNU Binutils DWARF Section dwarf.c process_debug_info memory leak | 4.4 | 0.0027 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-11495 | GNU Binutils Linker elf64-x86-64.c elf_x86_64_relocate_section heap-based overflow | 5.5 | 0.0024 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-11413 | binutils: This update for binutils fixes the following issues: - Do not enable '-z gcs=implicit' on aarch64 for old codestream... | 5.5 | 0.0022 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2025-11494 | GNU Binutils Linker elfxx-x86.c _bfd_x86_elf_late_size_sections out-of-bounds | 5.5 | 0.0022 | None reported |
Showing 1 to 25 of 27
1Next
Patch Radar data is free to use with attribution. Terms and how to credit it.
Product names, logos and trademarks shown on Patch Radar belong to their respective owners. They are used only to identify the software each security fix applies to and to help readers find their platform. Their use does not imply any affiliation with, or endorsement by, those owners, and Patchblox is not affiliated with any of them.