Linux ·
Fedora · Security advisory · May 22, 2026
Fedora · Security advisory · May 22, 2026FEDORA-2026-9FD50B2FF1: Security update for 9 packages
FEDORA-2026-9FD50B2FF1, released May 22, 2026, fixes 15 CVEs across 9 products. None of them is reported as exploited. Patch Radar priority: Urgent.
Urgent
CVEs closed
15
1 rated Critical
Exploited
0
None reported
Highest CVSS
9.9
Base score, 0 to 10
Highest EPSS
0.0052
44th percentile
Priority of the 15 CVEs
Patch now 0
Urgent 1
High 10
Routine 4
Fixed package versions
| Product | Release | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| netatalk | Fedora 43 | 5:4.4.3-1.fc43 |
| netatalk-afptest | Fedora 43 | 5:4.4.3-1.fc43 |
| netatalk-afptest-debuginfo | Fedora 43 | 5:4.4.3-1.fc43 |
| netatalk-appletalk | Fedora 43 | 5:4.4.3-1.fc43 |
| netatalk-appletalk-debuginfo | Fedora 43 | 5:4.4.3-1.fc43 |
| netatalk-debuginfo | Fedora 43 | 5:4.4.3-1.fc43 |
| netatalk-debugsource | Fedora 43 | 5:4.4.3-1.fc43 |
| netatalk-devel | Fedora 43 | 5:4.4.3-1.fc43 |
| netatalk-doc | Fedora 43 | 5:4.4.3-1.fc43 |
CVEs this fix closes
| Priority | CVE | Title | CVSS | EPSS | Exploitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urgent | CVE-2026-44050 | netatalk: A heap-based buffer overflow in the CNID daemon comm_rcv() function in Netatalk 2.0.0 through 4.4.2 allows a remote a... | 9.9 | 0.0042 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2026-44049 | netatalk: An out-of-bounds write due to improper null termination in convert_charset() in Netatalk 2.0.4 through 4.4.2 allows a... | 7.5 | 0.0052 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2026-44048 | netatalk: A stack-based buffer overflow via UCS-2 type confusion in convert_charset() in Netatalk 2.0.4 through 4.4.2 allows a... | 8.8 | 0.0042 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2026-44047 | netatalk: An SQL injection vulnerability in the MySQL CNID backend in Netatalk 3.1.0 through 4.4.2 allows a remote authenticate... | 8.8 | 0.0037 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2026-44055 | netatalk: A logic error involving bitwise OR operations in Netatalk 3.1.4 through 4.4.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker... | 7.5 | 0.0036 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2026-44062 | netatalk: A missing output length bounds check in pull_charset_flags() in Netatalk 2.0.4 through 4.4.2 allows a remote authenti... | 7.5 | 0.0036 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2026-44060 | netatalk: An integer underflow in dsi_writeinit() in Netatalk 1.5.0 through 4.4.2 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to c... | 7.5 | 0.0033 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2026-44068 | netatalk: Incomplete sanitization of extended attribute (EA) path components in Netatalk 2.1.0 through 4.4.2 allows a remote au... | 7.6 | 0.0032 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2026-44066 | netatalk: Multiple heap out-of-bounds reads in the Spotlight RPC unmarshalling code in Netatalk 3.1.0 through 4.4.2 allow a rem... | 7.1 | 0.0029 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2026-44052 | netatalk: Netatalk 2.1.0 through 4.4.2 inserts LDAP simple-bind passwords into log output in cleartext, which allows an attacke... | 7.5 | 0.0025 | None reported |
| High | CVE-2026-44064 | netatalk: An out-of-bounds read in ASP session ID handling in Netatalk 1.3 through 4.4.2 allows an adjacent network attacker to... | 7.1 | 0.0017 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2026-44054 | netatalk: Netatalk 2.0.0 through 4.4.2 generates AFP session tokens derived from predictable process IDs, which allows a remote... | 6.5 | 0.0028 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2026-44057 | netatalk: A dead bounds check in the Spotlight RPC unmarshaller in Netatalk 3.0.0 through 4.4.2 results in an unreachable code... | 3.1 | 0.0019 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2026-44076 | netatalk: Insufficient sanitization of volume paths in Netatalk 3.1.0 through 4.4.2 allows a local privileged user to inject OS... | 6.7 | 0.0013 | None reported |
| Routine | CVE-2026-44069 | netatalk: An integer underflow in the volxlate function in Netatalk 3.0.0 through 4.4.2 allows a local privileged user to obtai... | 3.9 | 0.0009 | None reported |
Showing 1 to 15 of 15
1
Patch Radar data is free to use with attribution. Terms and how to credit it.
Product names, logos and trademarks shown on Patch Radar belong to their respective owners. They are used only to identify the software each security fix applies to and to help readers find their platform. Their use does not imply any affiliation with, or endorsement by, those owners, and Patchblox is not affiliated with any of them.