named aborts on a TKEY query when the user configuration has no global options statement
CVE-2026-76163 is fixed in 6 products on 1 platform, first by bind9 1:9.20.24-1ubuntu0.4, released September 16, 2026. It is not reported as exploited. Patch Radar priority: High.
If BIND is loaded with a "`named.conf`" file that contains no global "`options`" block, an attacker can send a query of QTYPE TKEY which may cause an assertion failure and subsequent unexpected program exit. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.
Where it's fixed
| Product | Fixed in | Fix | Released |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | |||
| bind · opensuse-leap 16.0 | 9.20.29-160000.1.1 | OPENSUSE-SU-2026:22049-1 | Oct 7, 2026 |
| bind · sles 15.7 | 9.20.29-150700.3.32.2 | SUSE-SU-2026:4285-1 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| bind · sles 16.0 | 9.20.29-160000.1.1 | SUSE-SU-2026:24157-1 | Oct 7, 2026 |
| bind9 · Debian 13.5 (trixie) | 1:9.20.29-1~deb13u1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2026-76163 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| bind9 · Debian 14 | 1:9.20.29-1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2026-76163 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| bind9 · Ubuntu 26.04.1 LTS (resolute) | 1:9.20.24-1ubuntu0.4 | bind9 1:9.20.24-1ubuntu0.4 | Sep 16, 2026 |
| bind9-dnsutils · Ubuntu 26.04.1 LTS (resolute) | 1:9.20.24-1ubuntu0.4 | bind9-dnsutils 1:9.20.24-1ubuntu0.4 | Sep 16, 2026 |
| bind9-host · Ubuntu 26.04.1 LTS (resolute) | 1:9.20.24-1ubuntu0.4 | bind9-host 1:9.20.24-1ubuntu0.4 | Sep 16, 2026 |
| bind9-libs · Ubuntu 26.04.1 LTS (resolute) | 1:9.20.24-1ubuntu0.4 | bind9-libs 1:9.20.24-1ubuntu0.4 | Sep 16, 2026 |
| bind9-utils · Ubuntu 26.04.1 LTS (resolute) | 1:9.20.24-1ubuntu0.4 | bind9-utils 1:9.20.24-1ubuntu0.4 | Sep 16, 2026 |
Patch Radar data is free to use with attribution. Terms and how to credit it.
Product names, logos and trademarks shown on Patch Radar belong to their respective owners. They are used only to identify the software each security fix applies to and to help readers find their platform. Their use does not imply any affiliation with, or endorsement by, those owners, and Patchblox is not affiliated with any of them.