libarchive-tools: A vulnerability was found in libarchive up to 3.7.7
CVE-2025-1632 is fixed in 3 products on 1 platform, first by DEBIAN-CVE-2025-1632, released February 24, 2025. It is not reported as exploited. Patch Radar priority: Routine.
A vulnerability was found in libarchive up to 3.7.7. It has been classifiedas problematic. This affects the function list of the file bsdunzip.c. Themanipulation leads to null pointer dereference. It is possible to launchthe attack on the local host. The exploit has been disclosed to the publicand may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure butdid not respond in any way.
Where it's fixed
| Product | Fixed in | Fix | Released |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | |||
| libarchive · Debian 13.5 (trixie) | 3.7.4-2 | DEBIAN-CVE-2025-1632 | Feb 24, 2025 |
| libarchive · Debian 14 | 3.7.4-2 | DEBIAN-CVE-2025-1632 | Feb 24, 2025 |
| libarchive · opensuse-leap 15.6 | 3.7.2-150600.3.12.1 | SUSE-SU-2025:0985-1 | Mar 21, 2025 |
| libarchive · sles 15.6 | 3.7.2-150600.3.12.1 | SUSE-SU-2025:0985-1 | Mar 21, 2025 |
| libarchive-tools · Ubuntu 24.04.5 LTS (noble) | 3.7.2-2ubuntu0.4 | libarchive-tools 3.7.2-2ubuntu0.4 | Mar 1, 2025 |
| libarchive-tools · Ubuntu 24.10 (oracular) | 3.7.4-1ubuntu0.2 | libarchive-tools 3.7.4-1ubuntu0.2 | Jan 16, 2026 |
| libarchive-tools · Ubuntu 25.04 (plucky) | 3.7.7-0ubuntu2.1 | libarchive-tools 3.7.7-0ubuntu2.1 | Jan 16, 2026 |
| libarchive13t64 · Ubuntu 24.04.5 LTS (noble) | 3.7.2-2ubuntu0.4 | libarchive13t64 3.7.2-2ubuntu0.4 | Mar 1, 2025 |
| libarchive13t64 · Ubuntu 24.10 (oracular) | 3.7.4-1ubuntu0.2 | libarchive13t64 3.7.4-1ubuntu0.2 | Jan 16, 2026 |
| libarchive13t64 · Ubuntu 25.04 (plucky) | 3.7.7-0ubuntu2.1 | libarchive13t64 3.7.7-0ubuntu2.1 | Jan 16, 2026 |
Patch Radar data is free to use with attribution. Terms and how to credit it.
Product names, logos and trademarks shown on Patch Radar belong to their respective owners. They are used only to identify the software each security fix applies to and to help readers find their platform. Their use does not imply any affiliation with, or endorsement by, those owners, and Patchblox is not affiliated with any of them.