rust-vm-memory: In a typical Virtual Machine Monitor (VMM) there are several components, such as boot loader, virtual device drivers,...
CVE-2023-41051 is fixed in rust-vm-memory on 1 platform, first by DEBIAN-CVE-2023-41051, released September 1, 2023. It is not reported as exploited. Patch Radar priority: Routine.
In a typical Virtual Machine Monitor (VMM) there are several components, such as boot loader, virtual device drivers, virtio backend drivers and vhost drivers, that need to access the VM physical memory. The vm-memory rust crate provides a set of traits to decouple VM memory consumers from VM memory providers. An issue was discovered in the default implementations of the `VolatileMemory::{get_atomic_ref, aligned_as_ref, aligned_as_mut, get_ref, get_array_ref}` trait functions, which allows out-of-bounds memory access if the `VolatileMemory::get_slice` function returns a `VolatileSlice` whose length is less than the function’s `count` argument. No implementations of `get_slice` provided in `vm_memory` are affected. Users of custom `VolatileMemory` implementations may be impacted if the custom implementation does not adhere to `get_slice`'s documentation. The issue started in version 0.1.0 but was fixed in version 0.12.2 by inserting a check that verifies that the `VolatileSlice` returned by `get_slice` is of the correct length. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.
Where it's fixed
| Product | Fixed in | Fix | Released |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | |||
| rust-vm-memory · Debian 13.5 (trixie) | 0.12.2-1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2023-41051 | Sep 1, 2023 |
| rust-vm-memory · Debian 14 | 0.12.2-1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2023-41051 | Sep 1, 2023 |
Patch Radar data is free to use with attribution. Terms and how to credit it.
Product names, logos and trademarks shown on Patch Radar belong to their respective owners. They are used only to identify the software each security fix applies to and to help readers find their platform. Their use does not imply any affiliation with, or endorsement by, those owners, and Patchblox is not affiliated with any of them.